Of course I am expert on none of those subjects, but I assumed I could study hard from here to then and get prepared to fluidly discuss Serres, Collins, Viveiros de Castro, CRISPR and just whatever… I have already heard stories of referees pushed towards accepting papers of dubious quality.Īgainst all odds I am making long-term plans: I accepted an invitation by my dear friend Aleksandar Ostojic to travel to Serbia next June 14th to discuss about science, philosophy, sociology, anthropology, and all that. Only note for now: one point that I think is missing is that paying to publish introduces the very dangerous principle that “truth” (whatever that is) can be bought in retail. Instead, I do not like at all superficial judgements on the scientific achievements of “China” and “India” – unless they get framed into a broader picture of scientific colonization.įinally, I also have strong opinions about “open access” policies and the way they are being promoted, but I will keep them for discussion. Personally, I am very sympathetic with many of their considerations, expecially those regarding the industrial practices of scientific publishers (I could add some experience of mine…), and the devaluation of pedagogical material. Indeed the range of opinions expressed there is quite wide, and not fully compatible one with another. It will definitely not pass as a “deliverable”, fulfilling milestones, GANTT charts and all that bullshit…įrom what I understand it is intended to spark an open discussion on scientific publishing based on personal testimonies, coming from people with very different responsibilities and roles (but common background). Some colleagues wrote a sort of opinion paper, mainly addressed to the StatPhys & Thereabouts community, to speak out their personal dislike for the current state of affairs in scientific publishing. “Time-dependent density functional theory of open quantum systems in the linear-response regime.” The Journal of chemical physics 134.7 (2011): 074116. Grégoire Defoort: Tempel, David G., et al.

“Purification of Lindblad dynamics, geometry of mixed states and geometric phases.” Journal of Geometry and Physics 133 (2018): 42-70. “The nonequilibrium cost of accurate information processing.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.09369 (2022). Day 3: Thursday March 31st, 12 am – BSC 0.04, Campus LimpertsbergĪtul Tanaji Mohite, Meng, Fei, et al. “Quantum random walks: an introductory overview.” Contemporary Physics 44.4 (2003): 307-327. “Fluctuations of quantum currents and unravelings of master equations.” Journal of Statistical Physics 131.2 (2008): 341-356.īyjesh Nalini: Kempe, Julia. Nicoletta Carabba: Dereziński, Jan, Wojciech De Roeck, and Christian Maes. “Entropy production along nonequilibrium quantum jump trajectories.” New Journal of Physics 15.8 (2013): 085028. Shesha Gopal Marehalli Srinivas: Horowitz, Jordan M., and Juan MR Parrondo. Michael Philipp Adams presents his own work on “Quantum Langevin Equation: Simulation of the Harmonic Oscillator”. Day 2: Tuesday March 1st, 2 pm – BSC 007, Campus Limpertsberg

Kunmin Wu: Matthias Gau, Reinhold Egger, Alex Zazunov, and Yuval Gefen “Towards dark space stabilization and manipulation in driven dissipative Majorana platforms.” PHYSICAL REVIEW B 102, 134501 (2020). “Slippage of initial conditions for the Redfield master equation.” The Journal of chemical physics 111.13 (1999): 5668-5675. “Quantum systems subject to the action of classical stochastic fields.” Physical Review A 64.5 (2001): 052110.Īshwin Gopal: Gaspard, Pierre, and Masataka Nagaoka. “The quantum open system as a model of the heat engine.” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 12.5 (1979): L103. “On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups.” Communications in Mathematical Physics 48.2 (1976): 119-130. Day 1: Monday February 28th, 2 pm – BSC 007, Campus LimpertsbergĪpollo Matsoukas: Lindblad, Goran. Two half-days dedicated to discussion of literature and ideas. Final exam of the Open Quantum Systems Ph.D.

Guardare di traverso